Which factor is NOT typically considered when identifying ideas or alternatives in design?

When identifying ideas or alternatives in design, factors such as cost, function, and material costs are crucial considerations. These aspects directly impact the feasibility and practicality of the design. Cost involves understanding the financial limitations and budget constraints of a project, while function pertains to how well a design performs its intended purpose. Material costs are vital as they influence the overall expenditure and choices available during the design process.

Color schemes, on the other hand, while important in terms of aesthetics and user appeal, are typically not a primary consideration when evaluating viable alternatives or ideas. The primary focus in the early stages of design is often on functionality, budget, and material viability rather than the visual aspects. Therefore, while color might enhance a design's overall look and feel, it does not usually play a role in the fundamental decision-making process regarding the feasibility or effectiveness of the design alternatives.